Period Drama Challenge: May Tag Questions

May Tag Questions:


1)  What period dramas have you watched in May?


I went to see The Great Gatsby (2013).




2)  Do you enjoy period drama set murder mysteries (such as Hercule Poirot or Sherlock Holmes)?

The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (1984).

I am an avid fan of Sherlock Holmes.  My favorite adaptations of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's stories are the 1984 TV series called "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes", which starred Jeremy Brett as detective Sherlock Holmes, and the more recent BBC series starring Benedict Cumberbatch as Sherlock Holmes, and Martin Freeman as John Watson, although that version is set in modern London.  I loved the first series of Sherlock, but I think the second series is even more brilliant.  All three episodes of series two are perfection.

Sherlock (2010).

Scarlett O'Hara in her crimson red dress.

3)  If you could choose any period drama character's wardrobe to wear for a day, which character would you choose?

I like a lot of the dresses Margaret Hale wears in North and South, especially the one with the white top, as you can see in the picture below.

Margaret Hale (right) in one of her many beautiful dresses.

I also love Scarlett O'Hara's outfits in Gone with the Wind.  She has so many outstandingly beautiful dresses.  One of my favorite dresses is the red dress in the picture up above.  I don't know if I would wear it, but if I were to wear it, I would like it to be emerald or forest green instead of red.  The shade of red that this dress has is vibrant and looks stunning on Scarlett, but I would rather wear green, as it would go better with my complexion.

4)  Have you ever watched a period drama solely because your favorite actor was in it?


The only reason I watched BBC's Robin Hood was because Richard Armitage played Guy of Gisborne, but quickly I grew fond of the show and loved almost all of the characters.

5)  How many Louisa May Alcott adaptations have you seen?


I have seen Little Women (1994).  I haven't watched it in a long, long, long time.  I remember enjoying it, but not being satisfied with the ending.

Period Drama Challenge Review #3: Lassie Come Home (1943) and Lassie (2005)

One question that many people are asked when they are little is "What do you want to be when you grow up?".  My answer to that question was always changing.  One time I wanted to be a fire fighter and another I wanted to be a picture book illustrator.  Eventually, I had thought up a list of possible future careers.  The more I grew up, the longer my list became.  One of the things I most wanted to be was a movie director.  Every time I was not satisfied with a movie, I dreamt of directing my own version.  This brings me to Lassie, the 2005 remake of Lassie Come Home (1943), based on the 1940 novel by Eric Knight.

Lassie (2005).

Lassie Come-Home tells the tale of Lassie, a loyal and highly prized Rough Collie strong of heart, grace, and intelligence, who journeys over hundreds of miles in Scotland to reunite with her family in Yorkshire, England.  Her family had sold her to the Duke of Rudling after Joe's father lost his job, when the coal-mine was shut down.  Lassie Come-Home is a classic story and a childhood favorite of mine, one that I hold in great esteem.  It's an emotional and timeless story about loyalty, hope, and perseverance to the very last.

Lassie Come Home (1943) and Lassie (2005) are movies that compliment each other exceedingly well in certain ways.  The faults of one movie are not present in the other; each movie does well at what the other movie does poorly, and vice-versa.  For example, the 1943 film had perfect casting, beautiful acting, and a beautiful spirit; it was like the book by Eric Knight had been brought to life.

Lassie meets Joe Carraclough (played by Roddy McDowall)
after school as she does every day.

However, one of its worst flaws almost completely destroyed my suspension of disbelief.  It is painfully obvious that the scenes in which Lassie journeys through Scotland are North American landscapes.  The Californian scenery is breathtakingly beautiful, but it is not Scotland.

Filming took place in Monterey, California and Washington state.

This is where the 2005 film excels.  There is stunning scenery and cinematography in Lassie (2005), which was filmed in Scotland, Ireland, and on the Isle of Man.

The heart of Lassie Come-Home is the relationship between Lassie and Joe Carraclough.  Their friendship guides the storytelling and sends an endearing message of faith, loyalty, and love, three incredibly human feelings.  In this way Lassie Come-Home is very much a story that speaks to the humanity present in all of us.  In Lassie Come Home (1943), Lassie and Joe's friendship is strong and the movie doesn't lose focus of that.  This is where, in my opinion, the 2005 remake goes wrong.  First of all, I have nothing against the actor (Jonathan Mason) chosen to play Joe, but he seems a little too young to me.  I picture Joe as a boy in the midst of his childhood, and not as young as Jonathan Mason's Joe seems.  I just don't feel that Jonathan Mason fits the part.

Lassie waits patiently outside of Joe's schoolhouse.

Joe meets Lassie after school.

My main issue with the 2005 version is the lack of focus on Lassie and Joe's relationship.  It wasn't developed enough or built upon enough.  There was far too much attention on the Duke and his granddaughter.

Peter O'Toole as the Duke (right) and Hester Odgers as his granddaughter, Cilla (left).

Don't get me wrong, I love Peter O'Toole.  I consider him to be one of the greatest actors of all time.  I thoroughly enjoyed his performance as the Duke of Rudling.  Hester Odgers, who plays Cilla, the Duke's granddaughter, was wonderful in her part as well, but I felt like the story had become about Cilla and her grandfather.  It was as though the focus had turned from Joe and Lassie to Cilla and Lassie.  Which is fine, I suppose, but it seems the movie spends far more time with Cilla than with Joe.  Maybe the title should be changed to "The Adventures of Cilla and Lassie".  I know I'm starting to sound a bit irritated, but truthfully, this issue really does irritate me.

I just didn't feel that the bond between Joe and Lassie was very strong, and it was not embellished upon enough.  I feel that if this movie had taken more time to develop the characters and create more atmosphere, it could have strengthened the bond between Lassie and Joe that is supposed to make up such a vital part of the story.  This brings me to yet another issue I had with the 2005 version; it felt rushed.  Everything seemed to go by so quickly.  I watched this movie twice and each time when I reached the ending, I felt it had come too soon.

Lassie lies exhausted and in pain after her long journey home.

I don't think this is how a movie should go about it; it needs to take its time and breath, and let the film meditate on scenes in order to create a feeling.  Scenes in Lassie (2005) were cut more like a normal movie, but in my view, a story like Lassie Come-Home should take its time and develop plenty of atmosphere.  I am never satisfied with a film when I feel that it has gone by too quickly.  This is why I wish that I could combine the best aspects of Lassie Come Home (1943) with those of Lassie (2005) and create a version of my own.  Both versions are good, but neither are quite right from my perspective.

Period Drama Challenge Review #2: The Great Gatsby

Some film adaptations of books alter the story to the point that they bear little resemblance to the story they're based on.  For me, Baz Luhrmann's The Great Gatsby is a refreshing change, as it is impressive in its dedication and faithfulness to the original text.  Luhrmann's film definitely does F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 novel justice, for which I am especially glad, because it is one of the best novels in American literature.  In mid May, I went to see The Great Gatsby in the theater.

The Great Gatsby (2013).

I had heard that this movie received poor reviews from critics, but was generally appreciated by the audience.  My conclusion is that the critics do not appreciate nor understand the artistry in Luhrmann's film, nor do they understand the book it's based on.  The audience's approval is more important than theirs anyhow.  I am prepared to admit, though, that this film is something of an art film and perhaps doesn't fit the general formula expected in the movie industry.

The Great Gatsby stars Leonardo DiCaprio as Jay Gatsby, Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway, Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan, and Joel Edgerton as Tom Buchanan.  Leonardo DiCaprio's portrayal of Mr. Gatsby is spot-on.

Leonardo DiCaprio as Mr. Gatsby in The Great Gatsby (2013).

“He smiled understandingly - much more than understandingly.  It was one of those rare smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it, that you may come across four or five times in life.  It faced - or seemed to face - the whole eternal world for an instant, and then concentrated on you with an irresistible prejudice in your favor.  It understood you just as far as you wanted to be understood, believed in you as you would like to believe in yourself, and assured you that it had precisely the impression of you that, at your best, you hoped to convey.” -  The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald

All of the actors and actresses portray their characters so vividly, it feels like the book has come to life.  It's as though each scene leaps out from the pages of the book onto the screen.

Visually, this movie is impressive and, to quote Jordan Baker (played by Elizabeth Debicki), "kind of takes your breath away", with its stunning and lavish style, flourish, and bursts of vibrant colors, which I think really express the attitude of the Golden Age of the 1920's.

The movie is very artistic in its visuals and focuses heavily on colors and symbolism, such as the eyes/glasses of Dr. Eckleburg, and the green light, just as F. Scott Fitzgerald did in his book.  Regarding the blue eyes, arguably the most important symbol in the book, the movie hints that it follows the "eyes of God" theory, which some critics have put forward, but basically leaves it open to interpretation.  Luhrmann's film seems to focus on the relationship between Daisy and Mr. Gatsby, which I really appreciate.  The director also does an excellent job of creating the chaotic, uneasy, extravagant, and loud atmosphere which typifies the period.

 

This is of course intentional, and I believe Luhrmann succeeds, since I've heard some people say they feel the movie is too loud and in their face.  The modern music heightens this effect of feeling overwhelmed with the energy and hysteria presented on screen during the party scenes.  The throbbing pace of the modern music, such as the song "A Little Party Never Killed Nobody", which has a mixture of swing, Hip-Hop, and Dubstep, echoes the pace of the story.

“New York, 1922.  The tempo of the city had changed sharply. The buildings were higher. The parties were bigger. The morals were looser and the liquor was cheaper. The restlessness approached hysteria.”

Stylistically, I love this film.  Some say they don't like the swift cuts Luhrmann often uses in scenes, but that is simply his editing style.  He is also known for combining contemporary music with period movies, so anyone surprised by the use of modern music in The Great Gatsby is obviously not familiar with his style.  I think the contemporary music fits this movie perfectly; it would not be the same without it.  Another aspect of The Great Gatsby that some people think unnecessary, is the use of words on the screen, which occur in scenes when the narrator, Nick Carraway, is shown writing the story.  I think this is beautifully and artistically done.  It's aesthetically pleasing to see the words drift away like snow into the background in the scene depicted below.  It is yet another testimony to how faithful this movie is to the book.  To me, Nick Carraway recites the lines of F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel like poetry.  It really makes me realize how beautiful Fitzgerald's writing is.  It's a tribute to the original novel - so much of the script comes from the novel's pages.

Some people think the use of Rap music in The Great Gatsby is unfitting, and believe music that was popular at the time should have been featured instead.  There really is quite a lot of authentic style '20's music in the movie (although much of the '20's music used is newly composed rather than lifted from the actual time period), but there is also modern Rap.  What these people don't realize, is that the blending of '20's and modern music is a brilliant concept.  Rap music and Jazz have a connection.  Rap was inspired by Jazz, and both music styles have flourished in African American culture.  Jazz was looked down upon in the 1920's, and Rap is looked down upon by some people nowadays.  The choice of Rap music in the movie bridges the gap between past and present, showing the similarities between then and now.  Then, people were experiencing the Jazz Age, and now, we are experiencing the age of Rap and Hip-Hop.  Luhrmann pointedly draws the parallel between the twenties and the thousands, by showing how the themes are still relevant today.  America remains materialistic, we have maintained our careless attitude, and the rich still party on.  We are still experiencing ups and downs in our economy - the dizzying heights and the depressions and recessions of capitalism, and we still seem to look toward the illusion of the American Dream, like the unrealistic and unattainable dream represented by the symbolic green light that Gatsby reaches out for across the harbor.  F. Scott Fitzgerald's critique of corrupt American society still applies.  This parallel is emphasized throughout the film.

The modern music that throbs during the party scenes is used purposely to create the alarming, loud, and chaotic effect that Jazz had.  Luhrmann uses modern music to make us feel as people in the 1920's felt about Jazz music.  Another reason Luhrmann uses the music he does is because it's his style.  Once again, anyone who is confused by his decision to feature modern music is most likely not aware of the director's style.  Luhrmann directed Romeo + Juliet (1996) and Moulin Rouge! (2001), in which he also used modern music to express themes and emotions.  In many of the songs featured on the soundtrack of The Great Gatsby, 1920's-style music is melded brilliantly with modern-day music, in songs like "Love is the Drug", "Where the Wind Blows", and "Crazy in Love".

"Love Is the Drug" by Bryan Ferry and The Bryan Ferry Orchestra:

"Where the Wind Blows" by Coco O. of Quadron:

"Crazy in Love" by Emeli Sandé and The Bryan Ferry Orchestra:

And then, there are my top three favorites.  These three songs capture the themes of The Great Gatsby very well.

1.  "Young and Beautiful" by Lana Del Rey:

2.  "Over the Love" by Florence and the Machine:

3.  "Love is Blindness" by Jack White:

Baz Luhrmann's The Great Gatsby brilliantly brings to life F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel.  I expected to love this movie walking into the theater, and I was definitely not disappointed walking out.  I suppose it would make sense to say that if you are not a fan of Luhrmann's style, you should not expect to like this movie, but then I am not really a fan of Moulin Rouge!, and I love this film.  The Great Gatsby is now one of my favorite movies.  I hope to see it again and I recommend it.